Skip to main content

Money Fights vs Prestige of the Belt


What matters more in MMA, so-called "money fights" or the prestige of the championship belt?

This question has been asked more and more in recent years, primarily because of Conor McGregor but there are others who it applies to as well.

Conor McGregor won the interim Featherweight title in 2015, defeating Chad Mendes by TKO in the 2nd round at UFC 189. He would go on to unify the title by knocking out Jose Aldo in just thirteen seconds at UFC 194 just five months later. McGregor never defended his title at 145-pounds, fighting Nate Diaz twice and 170-pounds and then challenging for the Lightweight title at UFC 205 in November of 2016. The UFC stripped him of the Featherweight title not long after UFC 205 when McGregor announced he intended to take time off from the UFC. He has since gone on to face Floyd Mayweather in a boxing match while a fight for the interim Lightweight title is set to take place this weekend at UFC 216.

McGregor's accomplishments and skill can't be denied. But are they good for the sport? Plenty of fans could argue that he's diminished the prestige of the titles he held by never defending him and that he's "not a true champion". Others could argue that he is the biggest star the sport has ever seen and the UFC wouldn't be at the level of popularity it currently enjoys if it weren't for McGregor.

And it seems as if McGregor may have started a trend.

Michael Bisping shocked the MMA world when he knocked out Luke Rockhold at UFC 199 to capture the UFC Middleweight title. However, rather than a rematch with Rockhold, or fights with seemingly obvious contenders Yoel Romero, Jacare Souza or Chris Weidman, Bisping's first title defense came against Dan Henderson at UFC 204. Henderson wasn't ranked in the top five in the division at the time. The fight was sold, not on the merit of Henderson as a contender, but as a "grudge match" since Henderson brutally knocked out Bisping at UFC 100 in what is widely viewed as one of the best knockouts in UFC history. Bisping defeated Henderson and it seemed that a showdown with Romero was the logical next step. However, that fight has not surfaced and instead, Bisping will defend his title against George St-Pierre at UFC 217. GSP, although he is a legend and arguably the greatest welterweight champion in UFC history, has never fought at Middleweight in the UFC and has not fought since 2013. Due to injuries and delays, the fight hasn't taken place yet and an interim Middleweight title fight occurred between Yoel Romero and Robert Whittaker took place at UFC 213. Whittaker would win that fight by unanimous decision and is now seemingly awaiting the winner of Bisping/GSP.

So what's better for the sport? Do fans want to see what they believe are the most entertaining fights regardless of ranking or whether one of the fighters has "earned it" or not? Or do the rankings matter and only fighters who have worked their way to getting a shot deserve to get the big fights (which come with the bigger checks)?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

When should fighters walk away from the sport?

Mark Hunt and Antonio "Bigfoot" Silva engage in a brutal war at UFC 193 in November of 2015. Combat sports are inherently dangerous. The entire point of the sport is to render your opponent unable to continue before he can do the same to you. So it's no surprise that many fighters don't have long careers, at least at the top of the sport, and those that do tend to show the effects of their brutal craft. But when should a fighter decide enough is enough and walk away? Antonio "Bigfoot" Silva has been fighting professionally since 2005 and has a record of 19-12-1. His claim to fame is being the first man to defeat the legendary Fedor Emelianenko when he submitted the Russian in 2011. After entering the UFC in 2012, Silva only managed three wins from 2012 to 2016. He's lost eight of his last ten fights and has been knocked out in all but one of those losses after only being knocked out twice in his career previously. In recent fights, Silva has lo...

Knockouts vs Submissions

When it comes to MMA, everyone loves a finish, whether it comes by KO/TKO or submission. But if given the option, how would you prefer to see a fight end? Obviously, a one-punch knockout or a head kick finish is highly entertaining and can make fans jump out of their seats in reaction. That's what I believe most fans would choose if they had to pick  how a fight should end. The act of rendering an opponent unconscious with a single strike or a combination of strikes draws people back to the gladiator days (luckily without the death and dismemberment). It's made more exciting by the fact that a knockout can come out of nowhere (see Uriah Hall's  finish  in UFC Pittsburgh). Submissions though, there's something to be said for forcing your opponent to quit in a fight. Whether it's a case of prolonged grappling leading to an eventual submission or sinking something like a guillotine choke in when the opponent goes for a takedown, giving your opponen...

What could Conor McGregor's legacy be?

Conor McGregor is the biggest name in mixed martial arts, without question. But with that name recognition, come certain expectations. Has McGregor lived up to those expectations so far? Let's start with McGregor's career prior to the UFC. Fighting in Europe, McGregor lost two of his first six fights before rattling off eight straight wins, including capturing both the Featherweight and Lightweight titles in the Cage Warriors promotion. He was a rising name on the scene with all 12 of his wins coming via TKO or Knockout. From his pro-debut in 2008 until he was signed by the UFC in 2013, McGregor established himself as a force to be reckoned with in European MMA. McGregor signed with the UFC in February of 2013 and made his promotional debut in April. He very quickly made his presence known in the UFC, earning a Knockout of the Night bonus by knocking out Marcus Brimage in just over a minute. A closely fought decision victory over Max Holloway saw McGregor's sto...